Does this solve a real problem, and does the first run make sense?
Get the review a senior team would have given you.
You shipped it alone, probably with AI. A working product lead, staff engineer or growth lead uses what you built and writes down what they would say in a design review.
No queue. No reviews to write back. Not useful? Refunded in full for 7 days after it lands.
Pick the lens
Choose the discipline. The reviewer comes from that bench and reviews only what they know.
Will this survive real users, and what did the model quietly get wrong?
Would anyone find this, understand it, and come back?
What you get
Every review has the same four parts, so you can act on it at once.
The parts that did what you claimed, confirmed by running them.
The exact input, click or edge case that failed. Specific enough to be a ticket.
You ask one question at order time. It gets a direct answer.
One prioritised recommendation, not a list of twelve.
An actual review
not a sample — this one shippedWritten for ClearAddress, an email-verification API. Reproduced with the maker's permission.
Ran my own address through it before writing this: curl ca.rda.run/v1/[email protected]. No key, no signup, and the answer came back in about 300ms. The checks it claims are the checks it does: it caught a mailinator address as disposable, flagged a dead domain, and rejected a malformed one on syntax.
How it works
A working URL, the one question you want answered, and which lens you want on it.
You see who before they start. Not a pool, not a queue. Decline and re-queue for free.
48 hours on a quick pass, 5 days on a full review. Miss the date and the whole amount comes back as credit on its own.
Pricing
Pay per review. No subscription. Not useful? Full refund for 7 days.
See what each tier includes